How To Hit The Inside Pitch

"Pull your hands in". "Just turn on it". "Keep it fair". These are all terms we have heard in regards to hitting the inside pitch with dominance. They all take practiced pregnant behind them and are helpful when used correctly. I desire to break information technology down a chip more. Instead of only throwing out cues, nosotros are going to look at what it takes to hit an inside pitch. We desire to understand the what so we can and then come with our ain unique how. Let'southward get to it.

I starting time desire to look at some stats related to hitting pitches in different zones. I retrieved all of the data via statcast search on baseball savant (baseballsavant.com). I used zones that indicated pitches either on the edge of the stikezone or off the plate. In other words, I used zones 11, 14, 17, 21, 24, 27, xiii, 16, 19, 23, 26, and 29 on the representation below:

(credit goes to baseball savant for this visual)

I wanted to make certain I was evaluating tough pitches. I didn't desire them to only exist inner/outer third, I wanted them on the edges. Pitches on the edges are harder to hitting. If you tin hit those, you tin definitely hit something on the inner third. Anyway here are some of the numbers I came up with, from the 2016 MLB season:

BA for LHB on inside pitch: .222

BA for LHB on outside pitch: .270

BA for RHB on inside pitch: .239

BA for RHB on outside pitch: .255

*Note: these numbers only include assurance that were put in play. In other words, I just took the stat of balls in play, no out and divided that by balls in play, outs after calculation the balls in play, no out to that total. Strikeouts, foul balls, etc were not taken into consideration. I tweeted about this a trivial bit before writing the commodity, but my numbers were off a tad. My apologies.

At kickoff glance these numbers threw me off a bit. Left handed batters were hitting 17 points lower than righties on inside pitches?! Then I thought about information technology a chip and information technology made sense. The shift is obviously working. Sorry lefties. Still, they make upward for that by hitting the outside pitch at a substantially greater rate, 15 points higher than righties. In the end, these two basically even themselves out, the departure but being 2 points in batting average. That brings up a whole new question in regards to the success of the shift. After all, even though left handed batters hitting the within pitch the worst, information technology appears they get that pitch the least often, in fact almost half as much according to the numbers I got. I don't know the reasoning backside this and will non cover it here as information technology is not in the scope of this commodity.

So we saw above that whether you are correct handed or left handed, hitters hit the outside pitch at a higher prune than the inside pitch. I don't think many of us would accept guessed that would be the example. Pitchers are e'er taught to go on the brawl outside if they want to stay out of trouble. These numbers but don't seem to justify that. When we take a deeper look, nosotros can get into why information technology may be harder for guys to square up assurance on the within edge.

Pitches that are thrown inside are often one of two types: Either the pitch is a fastball that is riding in on the hands, or the pitch is a breaking ball, often from an opposite handed pitcher, going for the hitters' back foot. These pitches are not like shooting fish in a barrel to hit. The fastball on the inner edge is the pitch in which the hitter has to be the quickest in getting to. The inside pitch requires the hitter to get it out in front a picayune chip further than whatsoever other pitch. Combine that with the fact that the fastball is the pitchers quickest pitch, and we see this is basically a test of the hitters swing efficiency. I.due east how quickly the batter can launch his swing and get his butt to the correct spot. The other pitch, the breaking ball going towards the hitters back foot, volition often start correct down the middle, pretending to be a fastball. It then darts downwardly at the last second, evading the hitters barrel. This pitch requires superior pitch recognition to lay off of. So both of these pitches, for different reasons, are 2 of the toughest to handle. It is no wonder the batting average is lower. That brings us to the question: how tin we get better at treatment this pitch?

The outset attribute is pitch recognition. This is something I don't think we know nearly enough nigh yet. We know that the best hitters mostly have the best eyesight. That'due south great, but what if you don't have great eyes? Is there annihilation you can do to makeup for that? Obviously, get glasses/contacts (or Lasik if you're willing to drop some cash). This should help a quite a bit. Later that, we tin can use dissimilar things to challenge your vision. Striking with ane center covered, accept video of pitchers and cutting it off right at ball release. You should be able to tell what pitch it is correct at that moment. (If y'all are an Apple tree user, Gamesense has a great app for this. I highly recommend information technology). A couple different companies sell goggles that obstruct your vision. All of these things will probably exist helpful in helping you recognize pitches better. Get on them.

The second aspect of this equation is the swing itself. As I already stated, the inside pitch is the one that requires the most swing efficiency. If yous cannot launch rapidly, you have no shot. Lets take a look at some successful, and some unsuccessful swings on inside pitches:

Mookie Betts Hour within pitch:

And one more. Miguel Cabrera 60 minutes on an within pitch:

Both of these pitches were absurdly far inside to be hit out of the ballpark. Now lets look at ii unsuccessful swings on inside pitches.

And 1 more:

The first thing I desire to do is get to contact of each of these swings. We tin can work backward from in that location. Showtime the two Hour'southward:

Here is Miggy:

Mookie:

Kemp:

Correa:

So they are all at similar positions at contact. The ane that stands out to me is Kemp. His shoulder angle seems to be a tad bit more downhill than the others. Now, his pitch was too a lilliputian lower than the other ones and so that will explain some of that. Yet, I also got a dissimilar feel when watching the swing he took. It looks like he pulled off only a hair. And yep, I know "pulling off the ball" is one of those grab phrases everyone throws around so allow me explain. Kickoff, two clips slowed down of the frames up to and through contact:

Miggy:

Kemp:

Watch both of their heads and front shoulders. With Miggy, nosotros see everything stay quiet. That allows the butt to keep its path without getting yanked off form. Kemp does not stay equally quiet. His caput moves a tad downwardly and his front end shoulder yanks to the left. Everything your body does will have an effect on the bat, and ultimately the barrel, which is really what nosotros are concerned about here. So if Kemp feels like he needs to yank to the left fifty-fifty a little bit, that is going to affect the path his butt is on. Try this. Stand up and get a broomstick, or really anything that is straight and is long enough to be on the basis merely still reach upward to your armpit region. Now, line it upward with your back foot and grab it with your left hand if you're a righty and right hand if you're a lefty. Now, without allowing your hand on the broomstick to come up forrard, plow your torso to the left if you're a righty and vice versa if you're a lefty. What happens to your front arm? Information technology straightens out, right? When your arm is directly it is farther away from your body. That doesn't bode well for striking the inside pitch! So when Kemp feels that lilliputian flake of demand to yank left to hitting this particular within pitch, he is non going to be able to get his barrel there.

Correa'southward instance is a piddling bit different. I didn't see him yank like Kemp did. Remember when I said there were two parts? The swing and the vision office? Correa executed a pretty good swing on the pitch he got. However it was so far up and in there wasn't much he could practise with it from the start, also not swing at it. There is rarely one answer for everything. It always depends on the situation.

So a quick review. To hit this pitch successfully we demand to:

-run across it correctly out of the mitt (true for every pitch)

-be quick/short to the ball (in this context "short" means what Cabrera did, long means what Kemp did)

That wraps up this mammoth postal service on hitting the inside pitch. If things weren't clear enough or you all the same accept questions, don't be afraid to ask!

Source: https://www.dacbaseball.com/hitting-the-inside-pitch-what-it-takes-and-what-it-means-for-your-swing/

Share this post